<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dark Art of Breakfast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saltshaker.net/20091111/the-dark-art-of-breakfast/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saltshaker.net/20091111/the-dark-art-of-breakfast</link>
	<description>Casting a little flavor (and a few aspersions) on the world of food, drink, and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.saltshaker.net/20091111/the-dark-art-of-breakfast/comment-page-1#comment-191256</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltshaker.net/?p=3139#comment-191256</guid>
		<description>We returned later in the week to check out those hamburgers. They&#039;re okay, not as good as they looked. The meat, as is common here, too finely ground, though well seasoned, it comes out almost more sausage like - the texture is just wrong for a burger, and is part of the reason they&#039;re not as juicy as they ought to be. Cooked to about medium or just past, toppings were similar to the breakfast - cubes of bacon, flavorless cheese, fresh lettuce and tomato, an over-fried egg, slices of supermarket lunch ham (we had two different kinds of burgers, this wasn&#039;t all on one) - the buns kind of interesting, not hamburger bun-like at all, similar to the rounds used on the breakfast plate - almost like the Dutch version of a &lt;em&gt;rusk&lt;/em&gt;, or &lt;em&gt;beschuitje&lt;/em&gt;, if they&#039;d been left a little bit softer. The fries, over-cooked and really oily - my dining companion described them as &quot;those fries you get if you order fried chicken wings at a Chinese restaurant in a poor neighborhood in New York&quot;. &#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We returned later in the week to check out those hamburgers. They&#8217;re okay, not as good as they looked. The meat, as is common here, too finely ground, though well seasoned, it comes out almost more sausage like &#8211; the texture is just wrong for a burger, and is part of the reason they&#8217;re not as juicy as they ought to be. Cooked to about medium or just past, toppings were similar to the breakfast &#8211; cubes of bacon, flavorless cheese, fresh lettuce and tomato, an over-fried egg, slices of supermarket lunch ham (we had two different kinds of burgers, this wasn&#8217;t all on one) &#8211; the buns kind of interesting, not hamburger bun-like at all, similar to the rounds used on the breakfast plate &#8211; almost like the Dutch version of a <em>rusk</em>, or <em>beschuitje</em>, if they&#8217;d been left a little bit softer. The fries, over-cooked and really oily &#8211; my dining companion described them as &#8220;those fries you get if you order fried chicken wings at a Chinese restaurant in a poor neighborhood in New York&#8221;. &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

